h/t Gateway Pundit
Check out the portion beginning at 2:06. Carried to the extreme what he is saying is we will decide what job you can have and train you for it, the state will raise your children so you can work, and if we deem you worthy we will allow you to open a business. In other words it is the Marxist-Leninist model with a slightly freindlier face.
The thing that really bugs me (well it all bugs me but this more than most of his drivel) is the idea that the state should accept / embrace the cost of raising kids. My belief is that that you shouldn't have kids until you can afford them both monetarily and as a function of time you can devote. I know that is an idealistic view, but it is the one we should be pushing. Not squirt one out we will pay for it.
OK that rant is over.
It really is no mystery why he and Bill Ayers get along so well. They both have a state centric socialist world view. One that is pretty well laid out in Bill Ayer's 1974 book Prairie Fire. (The one he dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan). In it Ayers flat out admits he is a communist dedicated to the overthrow of the US. Does sedition have a statue of limitations.
h/t Ace
More from Prairie Fire can be found here
No comments:
Post a Comment