Thursday, August 31, 2006

Soldier Ask Not and the Aeneid

I haven't read the Aeneid but today I was listening to a lecture about it. 

The lecturers premise was the Aeneid was Virgil's answer to the Iliad and the Odyssey and was his attempt to put Rome and Roman culture into perspective against Greek culture. 

As it was related in the lecture while Greece was an older and more sophisticated culture, it was also one which placed the individual above the group, whereas Roman culture was a series of duties which placed the group first.

That made me think of this song from Soldier Ask Not, a novel in Gordon Dickson's Childe Cycle.

Soldier, ask not - now, or ever,
Where to war your banners go.
Anarch's legions all surround us.
Strike - and do not count the blow!

Glory, honor, praise and profit,
Are but toys of tinsel worth.
Render up your work, unasking,
Leave the human clay to earth.

Blood and sorrow, pain unending,
Are the portion of us all.
Grasp the naked sword, opposing,
Gladly in the battle fall.

So shall we, anointed soldiers,
Stand at last before the Throne,
Baptized in our wounds, red-flowing,
Sealed unto our Lord - alone!

Don't know why it just seemed appropriate.  Actually it is surprising I still remember that poem, the last time I read it I think I was about 13.  Another one that I remember is from Jerry Pournelle's Falkenberg's Legion Series.

"We've left blood in the dirt of twenty-five worlds,
We've built roads on a dozen more,
And all that we have at the end of our hitch
Buys a night with a second-class whore.
The Senate decrees, the Grand Admiral calls,
The orders come down from on high.
It's 'On Full Kits' and 'Sound Board Ships,'
We're sending you where you can die."

"The lands that we take, the Senate gives back,
Rather more often than not,
But the more that are killed, the less share the loot,
And we won't be back to this spot.
We'll break the hearts of your women and girls,
We may break your arse, as well,
Then the Line Marines with their banners unfurled
Will follow those banners to hell.
We know the devil, his pomps, and his works,
Ah, yes! We know them well!
When you've served out your hitch in the Line Marines,
You can bugger the Senate of Hell!"

"Then we'll drink with our comrades and throw down our packs,
We'll rest ten years on the flat of our backs,
Then it's 'On Full Kits' and out of your racks,
You must build a new road through Hell!
The Fleet is our country, we sleep with a rifle,
No man ever begot a son on his rifle,
They pay us in gin and curse when we sin,
There's not one that can stand us unless we're downwind,
We're shot when we lose and turned out when we win,
But we bury our comrades wherever they fall,
And there's none that can face us, though we've nothing at all."

I actually performed that one as my dramatic reading for my 10th grade speech class.  The instructor wasn't thrilled, especially since he was a flaming commie and I was offering it as a commentary on American Foreign Policy and the Soldier.

tags: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Star Trek CGI update

Apparently Star Trek is being updated with new CGI effects for the 40th Anniversary of "The Original Series". 

Here is an example of the new effects from "The Doomsday Machine"

The major update appears at about 3:37

tags: , , ,

Saturday, August 26, 2006

The Froggy Doo Kidnapping 40 years later

In 1966 Billings Montana a beloved childrens icon Froggy Doo was kidnapped and held for ransom.   This dastradly act eventually involved the FBI (and probably the CIA and KGB).  Today the perpetrators reveal themselves in the Billings Gazette

Billy McColley claims he and his brother Harold and Jerry Pearl were the doll-nappers.  Of course I have always heard that two other brothers were at least involved if not the masterminds of the crime. 

This was actually a big enough deal in 1960's Montana that a movie is being made out of it, "A Plumm Summer"

tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 24, 2006

What does JK Rowling do with her money? Blow it all on hookers and beer?

No such luck according to the Daily Telegraph.

Aside from a few vacations, some clothing and the occasional human sacrifice she is pretty modest in her expenditures:

But as she told an interviewer recently: 'I've got a mental amount I can't spend beyond. I limit myself to what I think I would be justified in spending on frivolity.' The amount, it seems, is around £500.

For although her life is comfortable and she allows herself some 'treats', in truth Jo Rowling lives not much better than the wife of say, an averagely successful City banker. She does not have, a la Posh, a dozen diamond-encrusted watches - actually she barely ever wears one and the most expensive in her collection is a fairly simple £300 number from Gucci.

She also contributes to charity:

She has just set up a charity, the Children's High Level Group, to promote children's rights, particularly disabled children in care homes in Eastern Europe. She is the global ambassador for the National Council for One-Parent Families, and patron of Maggie's Centres for cancer sufferers and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Scotland.

Her bounty extends to smaller matters, too: she has funded the making of a short film about domestic abuse, and recently donated a signed copy of Harry Potter that was sold to help improve facilities at a local GP's surgery.

This seems to be a growing pattern with the Ultra-Rich.  Give it all away.

I disapprove for two reasons:

1.  I am not getting any of it

2.  I like the super-rich flashy and trashy so I can make fun of them.

Oh and in case you haven't figured it out I made up the part about vacations human sacrifices.

tags: , , ,

Sunday, August 20, 2006

The Stranger by Albert Camus

Cross posted at Olympia Academy, but since President Bush has been taking a bunch of crap for reading this book I decided to post it here also.

I am finding "The History of the Peloponnesian War" tough going so I took a break with "The Stranger"

 

I don't quite know what to make of this book. 

In one sense it seems like a political tale.  Meursault has killed an Arab and therefore he must be punished.  That really isn't the thrust of the novel though.  The killing and even the trial are really trivial to the main point.  Stage dressing so to speak.

The main point of "The Stranger" in my mind is the folly of letting society dictate morality.  Meursault isn't tried and sentenced to death because he killed an Arab.  He is tried because he does not conform to societies moral norms.  Specifically it appears he is indifferent to his mothers death.  This and his refusal to acknowledge God convince the court and the jury that he is a monster who was only capable of premeditated murder. 

Camus appears to argue this is wrong.  The reader is aware of the circumstances and should be (at least I was) frustrated at the inability of his lawyer to make a better case and of the overreaching of the Prosecutor's claims that Meursault's crimes are equivalent or more horrific than intentional Parricide. 

I disagree in a way.  While Meursault is not guilty of premeditated murder, he is also not guiltless.  His inability for introspection and his lack of a sense of right and wrong, illustrated when he lies to the police for Raymond, when he helps Raymond plan to punish his woman, and when he doesn't intervene when Raymond is beating her, are characteristic of a sociopath.  In other words one incapable of existing normally in society. 

It's there I find the dilemma in "The Stranger", I feel sorry for Meursault although his choices have put him in the situation he finds himself in I don't think he is really guilty.  After all the Arabs followed Meursault and Raymond to the beach, the Arabs pulled a weapon first and cut Raymond, and the Arab pulled the knife to intimidate Meursault.  But at the same time I recognize that a shared morality is what holds a society together.  That sense of right and wrong is what allows people to interact on a day to day basis and Meursault violates that code so maybe he really does deserve to be punished.  I don't have a good answer. 

tags: The Stranger, Albert Camus, Books, Literature, Politics, Bush

Thursday, August 03, 2006

2 years alcohol free

Just realized I hit the two year mark today. And no I am not an alcoholic I just stopped after an extended vacation 2 years ago.

Sometimes I really want a shot of Wild Turkey with a beer back or a boilermaker, but I just drink a tonic with lime and the urge passes.

Now it's just kind of a habit I am reluctant to break.